AudiologyOnline Phone: 800-753-2160


HearUSA - Newsweek - September 2024

UCL and Stapedius Reflex Threshold

Diana C. Emanuel, PhD, CCC-A

June 28, 2004

Share:

Question

Is there a link between the UCL and the stapedius reflex threshold?

Answer

Beginning in the 1970s, studies have been conducted to determine if the Acoustic Reflex Threshold (ART) could predict Uncomfortable Loudness Level (UCL, also known as Loudness Discomfort Level, LDL). If we could accurately predict UCL given ART, useful hearing aid fitting information could be obtained for difficult to test patients. The ability to predict UCL based on ART depends on the relationship between these two measures.

Both ART and UCL are affected by degree of hearing loss. Average ARTs are about the same for people with normal hearing and sensorineural hearing loss when the pure tone threshold is below 45-50 dBHL (Gelfand et al., 1990). As hearing threshold increases above this point, ART increases. UCL varies with hearing loss in a similar way. Average UCL is similar for people with normal hearing or sensorineural hearing loss with thresholds below about 50 dBHL, with a gradual increase in UCL as hearing threshold increases (Kamm et al., 1978). Thus, it would seem logical that as ART increases, UCL also increases; however, there have been conflicting reports in the literature regarding the strength of this relationship. Charuhas et al. (1979) investigated the relationship among UCL, ART, and hearing loss in 80 subjects with normal hearing or noise induced hearing loss. They found a high correlation between hearing threshold and UCL (-.99) and between hearing threshold and ART (-.98); however they found the ART to UCL relationship varied based on degree of hearing loss.

Dirks and Morgan (1983) provided a brief literature review on the UCL to ART relationship from studies conducted in the 1970s. Some of the studies indicated a wide intersubject variability for both ART and UCL and a low rank order correlation between the two measures. Dirks and Morgan concluded, "the variables affecting the LDL and the absence of a predictable relationship between LDL and ART make prediction of one measure from the other clinically inappropriate." More recently, Olsen (1999) conducted a meta-analysis of 11 studies of the relationship between ART, UCL, and HTL (pure-tone hearing threshold). He found no significant correlation between mean ART and mean UCL for people with normal hearing but a significant correlation between mean ART and mean UCL (.88), mean ART and mean HTL (.77), and mean UCL and mean HTL (.66) for people with hearing loss. Since this was a meta-analysis, he was not able to study individual participant data. Olsen suggested methodological issues including inconsistent instructions to the listeners, sound pressure level in the ear, subject selection criteria, and so forth, influenced the conflicting nature of the results from previous studies. He recommended further study of the relationship between UCL and ART in both normal and impaired ears using standardized instructions and more careful control of subject selection criterion.

In summary, early studies have suggested the absence of a strong relationship between individual ART and UCL measures, but a recent meta analysis found a significant correlation between mean UCL and mean ART for people with hearing loss, but not for people with normal hearing. More research, with careful control of study methodology, is needed to further explore the individual relationship between UCL and ART for people with normal hearing and hearing loss.

Charuhas, P.A., Chung, D.Y., & Barry (1979). Relationship between uncomfortable loudness level and acoustic reflex threshold as a function of hearing loss. The Journal of Auditory Research, 19, 237-242.

Dirks, D.D. & Morgan, D.E. (1983). Measures of discomformt and most comfortable loudness, pp 203-229. In D.F. Konkle & W.F. Rintelmann (Eds.), Principles of Speech Audiometry. Baltimore: University Park Press.

Gelfand, S.A., Schwander, T., & Silman, S. (1990). Acoustic reflex thresholds in normal and cochlear-impaired ears: Effects of no-response rates on 90th percentiles in a large sample. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 55, 198-205.

Olsen, S.O. (1999). The relationship between the uncomfortable loudness level and the acoustic reflex threshold for pure tones in normally-hearing and impaired listeners - A meta analysis. Audiology, 38, 61-68.

Kamm, C., Dirks, D., & Mickey, R. (1978). Effect of sensorineural hearing loss on loudness discomfort level for speech. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 11, 497-508.


Dr. Diana Emanuel has been a faculty member at Towson University for 9 years. She is currently the Audiology Graduate Program Director for the Au.D. Program at Towson University. She can be reached at demanuel@towson.edu.


Diana C. Emanuel, PhD, CCC-A

professor and the program director for the Doctor of Audiology (Au.D.) program at Towson University

Diana C. Emanuel, Ph.D. is a professor and the program director for the Doctor of Audiology (Au.D.) program at Towson University. She earned her bachelor’s degree from Towson State University (1988) and her M.S. (1990) and Ph.D. (1993) from Penn State. She teaches in the areas of hearing science, audiology diagnostics, and anatomy and physiology of the auditory system. Her research interests include behavioral auditory processing assessment, hearing science, and pedagogy in Communication Sciences and Disorders. Dr. Emanuel is the co-author of Hearing Science (2009), which provides a student/instructor-friendly approach to learning and teaching hearing science.


Related Courses

Using GSI for Cochlear Implant Evaluations
Presented by Joseph Dansie, AuD
Recorded Webinar
Grason-Stadler (GSI)

Presenter

Joseph Dansie, AuD
Course: #39682Level: Introductory1 Hour
  'Solid course'   Read Reviews
This course is designed to educate audiologists on the practical workflow for patients who require cochlear implants. From Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved indications and Medicare requirements to pre-op and post-op evaluations, audiologists will gain a clear understanding of the cochlear implant process.

View this Course for FREE.
Need CEUs? Become a AudiologyOnline member to get unlimited CEUs.

Only $129/yr

Learn More

Empowerment and Behavioral Insights in Client Decision Making, presented in partnership with NAL
Presented by Simon Alperstein, MSc BE, Paola Incerti, MAudiology, AAudA
Recorded Webinar
AudiologyOnline

Presenters

Simon Alperstein, MSc BEPaola Incerti, MAudiology, AAudA
Course: #37124Level: Intermediate1 Hour
  'The information was relevant, and I was able to relate to example given and found the suggestions to address these could be implemented in clinic'   Read Reviews
Behavioral Insights can be used to understand and support hearing health decision-making, particularly in the appointment setting. An overview of empowering the individual's first awareness of hearing loss to hearing aid fitting and then to becoming an active hearing aid user will be covered.

View this Course for FREE.
Need CEUs? Become a AudiologyOnline member to get unlimited CEUs.

Only $129/yr

Learn More

Cognition and Audition: Supporting Evidence, Screening Options, and Clinical Research
Presented by Regina Presley, AuD, FAAA, CCC-A
Recorded Webinar
Cognivue

Presenter

Regina Presley, AuD, FAAA, CCC-A
Course: #37381Level: Introductory1 Hour
  'Well presented and very informative, particularly given that we are in the early stages of implementing Cognivue into our practice'   Read Reviews
The evidence supporting the connection between cognitive health and hearing performance continues to expand, further supporting the need for a cognitive screening tool as part of an audiology clinical practice. This course will provide guidance on cognitive screening options, the benefits and challenges of each, evidence to support the use of each tool, and current clinical research that is underway exploring new technologies, implementation, and clinical outcomes.

View this Course for FREE.
Need CEUs? Become a AudiologyOnline member to get unlimited CEUs.

Only $129/yr

Learn More

Innovative Audiologic Care Delivery
Presented by Rachel Magann Faivre, AuD, Lori Zitelli, AuD, Heather Malyuk, AuD, Ben Thompson, AuD
Recorded Webinar
AudiologyOnline

Presenters

Rachel Magann Faivre, AuDLori Zitelli, AuDHeather Malyuk, AuDBen Thompson, AuD
Course: #38661Level: Intermediate4 Hours
  'informative'   Read Reviews
This four-course series highlights the next generation of audiology innovators and their pioneering approaches to meeting unmet audiologic needs in their communities and beyond. This peer-to-peer educational series highlights researchers, clinicians, and business owners and their pioneering ideas, care delivery models, and technologies which provide desperately needed niche services and audiologic care.

View this Course for FREE.
Need CEUs? Become a AudiologyOnline member to get unlimited CEUs.

Only $129/yr

Learn More

AURICAL HIT Applications Part 1 - Applications for Hearing Instrument Fittings and Beyond
Presented by Wendy Switalski, AuD, Jack Scott, PhD
Recorded Webinar
Natus

Presenters

Wendy Switalski, AuDJack Scott, PhD
Course: #28678Level: Intermediate1 Hour
  'Good communicator'   Read Reviews
Hearing instrument test boxes can provide clinicians with invaluable information about hearing instrument function, from evaluating technical status using electroacoustic analysis to assessing gain and output and advanced feature performance. This course will highlight the process for each of these using the Otometrics Aurical HIT. Additionally, clinical applications for these techniques will be overviewed.

View this Course for FREE.
Need CEUs? Become a AudiologyOnline member to get unlimited CEUs.

Only $129/yr

Learn More

Our site uses cookies to improve your experience. By using our site, you agree to our Privacy Policy.