AudiologyOnline Phone: 800-753-2160


Cochlear Osia System - June 2024

What is the Optimum Number of Hearing Aid Channels?

Lynda Clark, MS, CCC-A

January 9, 2006

Share:

Question

Are there any studies/research done regarding the effect of multiple bands and/or channels to increase the benefits received through amplification? If so, what is optimal? Also is there any research done on 'how long the hearing aids will last'?

Answer

Numerous studies have attempted to address the question concerning the benefits of multiple bands and/or channels and what is optimal. The difficulty in answering that question arises from the fact that hearing aids designed with the same number of bands/channels do not perform the same. Bands/channels can be used in different ways for different purposes. One manufacturer may use the bands/channels solely for frequency shaping, while another may implement independent signal processing schemes in a channel specific manner designed to enhance listening comfort. The shape or steepness of the channels/bands, the speed of the signal processing, and the overall bandwidth of the hearing aid all affect performance and contribute to sound quality.

The question of benefit is another difficult area to define. Benefit can refer to an objective, measurable improvement on a listening task; a user's perceived or subjectively reported improvement in hearing; and/or their perceived impressions in regards to comfort, ease of use and pleasantness of sound. Depending on how the study is constructed and the design of the hearing aids being studied, the optimal number of channel/bands will vary greatly.

The goal of a well designed hearing aid is to maximize speech understanding and sound quality. Furthermore, a well designed hearing aid should be able to fit persons with a variety of hearing loss configurations. With these goals in mind, Rickert and colleagues at Starkey Laboratories designed a study to answer the question, "how many independent signal processing channels are required to maximize speech audibility and to match a non-linear fitting formula for a variety of audiograms?" They began with 1156 audiograms and from those they identified 15 representative audiometric configurations. The fifteen audiograms were computationally fit to maximize speech audibility [as quantified by the Articulation Index (AI), ANSI S3:5] and to match targets from the Cambridge non-linear fitting formula using a range of channels varying from 1 to 18. The results, shown in the figure below, demonstrate that moving from 1 to 2 channels provides a statistically significant improvement in Articulation Index (AI), as does moving from 2 to 3 channels and from 3 to 4 channels. Although there is an improvement as the number of channels is increased to 5 or 6, the improvement is not statistically significant. After 6 channels there is no further improvement in AI at all.


Figure 1: Audibility quantified by improvement in Articulation Index as a function of the number for gain and compression channels. Each curve represents data from individual audiograms.


One might surmise from this study that the optimal number of channels is four. Four is the optimal number of channels if the channels are configured as they were in the study. In the Rickert, et al, study, the channels were independently configurable for gain and compression with adjustable crossover frequencies. There was no additional frequency shaping control. If additional frequency shaping (such as high and low pass filters) was available, 2 channels with an adjustable crossover frequency would have been sufficient. Without channel crossover frequency adjustments, more than 6 channels would have been needed to reach an optimal setting across the range of audiometric configurations.

The optimal number of channels and bands cannot be determined without considering the other design elements in a hearing instrument. For instance, advanced features such as noise management are often implemented on a channel-specific basis. Although I know of no research to confirm or deny the superiority of multi channel noise management, it is reasonable to assume that conservative noise management implemented on a channel specific basis which preserves audibility would be preferable to an overall gain reduction in the presence of background noise. However, in the absence of clinical validation studies, one should not assume that more channels or bands will equate to better performance or more benefit.

To answer the question of how long hearing aids will last, I would refer the reader to The Consumer Handbook on Hearing Loss & Hearing Aids: A Bridge to Healing, by Richard Carmen, Au.D., Editor. In the chapter written by Thayne Smedly, PhD and Ronal Schow, Ph.D entitled "Problem-Solving and Extending the Life of Your Hearing Aids", the writers state,
"You may have asked, 'How long will my hearing aids last?' Just as hearing aids will malfunction on occasion...it follows that they won't last indefinitely. This is true even for very expensive ones. For various reasons, cost being one of them, some wearers expect their instruments to last 10 to 15 years or more. Hearing aids that remain in useful service for this long are the exception rather than the rule. In fact, research has demonstrated that the typical hearing aid gets replaced about every five years."
Additionally, I poled a group of audiologist involved in fitting hearing instruments. The conventional wisdom of these professionals also indicates that hearing aids are generally replaced after three to five year of use. The three to five year number represents the buying habits of hearing aid wearers. The reader should bear in mind that hearing aids are replaced for a variety of reasons (aside from malfunctioning) such as the introduction of newer technology, the changing hearing needs of the user, or the ability to be fit with smaller instruments.

The factors that affect the life of a given hearing aid depend greatly on the care given. I contacted Starkey Laboratories Director of Quality Engineering Doug Link for more information on this mater. According to Doug, there are three primary environmental factors that will greatly affect the performance of a hearing instrument - Wax, Moisture and Mechanical Shock.

Wax from the ear can block the receiver and/or microphone ports. Daily cleaning is required to keep these ports open and prevent wax from migrating into the case of the hearing aid. Wax blocking devices in or on the receiver opening are effective in protecting the hearing aid. Individual hearing aid users would be well advised to consult a health professional about managing excessive wax build up in their own ears.

Exposure to moisture in the form of humidity, perspiration, and water all contribute to degrading the performance of a hearing aid over time. Hearing aids are designed and tested to withstand significant exposure to perspiration and humidity. Tests performed on sample products before market release include salt fog and damp heat testing. In salt fog testing, the instrument operation is tested in a warm (95F) salt fog chamber for multiple days. In damp heat testing, the aid operates for 21 consecutive days in a hot/humid environment of 40C & 95% relative humidity. The hearing aid is expected to function properly throughout both of these tests. It is important to realize that no instrument is immune to the ill effects of excessive moisture over time. Drying the hearing aid daily in one of the many available drying systems is highly recommended to ensure the longevity of the instrument.

Finally, permanent damage to a hearing aid can occur from being dropped, thrown, or stepped on. The damage may be visibly obvious, like a cracked case, or may be visually unnoticeable, like damage to the receiver resulting in distortion.

The bottom line is that proper care and maintenance can extend the useful life of hearing aids and enhance the listening enjoyment that they provide.

References
  1. Rickert M. Van Tasell DJ. Woods WS: Compression bands: How many are needed? Presented at the American Auditory Society, April 2000, Phoenix.

  2. ANSI S3.5: Method for Calculation of the Articulation Index. New York: American National Standards Institute, 1969.

  3. Moor BCJ, Alcantara JI, Stone MA, Glasberg BR: Use of a loudness model for hearing aid fitting: II. Hearing aids with multi-channel compression. Brit J. Audiol 1999; 33: 157-70.

  4. Carmen R (1998). The Consumer Handbook on Hearing Loss and Hearing Aids. A Bridge to Healing. Sedona, AZ: Auricle Ink Publishers.
Lynda Clark has been an audiologist for 19 years. She is a Product Design Audiologist at Starkey Laboratories and resides in Plymouth, MN. Lynda can be reached at lynda_clark@starkey.com.

For more information on Starkey, visit www.starkey.com


Lynda Clark, MS, CCC-A


Related Courses

A Deeper Look at Sound Environments
Presented by Don Schum, PhD
Recorded Webinar
Oticon

Presenter

Don Schum, PhD
Course: #33536Level: Intermediate1 Hour
  'Very well articulated'   Read Reviews
The characteristics of the sound environment have a fundamental impact on the performance of the hearing aid user. In this course, we will describe the obvious and sometimes more subtle aspects of sound environments that will affect hearing aid performance.

View this Course for FREE.
Need CEUs? Become a AudiologyOnline member to get unlimited CEUs.

Only $129/yr

Learn More

The Subjective Evaluation of a New Hearing Aid Fitting
Presented by Don Schum, PhD
Recorded Webinar
Oticon

Presenter

Don Schum, PhD
Course: #35584Level: Intermediate1 Hour
  'Very informative and pragmatic presentation regarding the importance of incorporating a subjective evaluation into the hearing aid fitting process'   Read Reviews
The final judge of the success of a new fitting will of course be the patient, and the criteria that they use may not always be in line with an objective audiological measure. This course will review some of the issues and options at play when having the patient weigh in on the value of the new devices.

View this Course for FREE.
Need CEUs? Become a AudiologyOnline member to get unlimited CEUs.

Only $129/yr

Learn More

Auditory Wellness: What Clinicians Need to Know
Presented by Brian Taylor, AuD, Barbara Weinstein, PhD
Audio
Signia

Presenters

Brian Taylor, AuDBarbara Weinstein, PhD
Course: #36608Level: Intermediate0.5 Hours
  'i loved the podcast format'   Read Reviews
As most hearing care professionals know, the functional capabilities of individuals with hearing loss are defined by more than the audiogram. Many of these functional capabilities fall under the rubric, auditory wellness. This podcast will be a discussion between Brian Taylor of Signia and his guest, Barbara Weinstein, professor of audiology at City University of New York. They will outline the concept of auditory wellness, how it can be measured clinically and how properly fitted hearing aids have the potential to improve auditory wellness.

View this Course for FREE.
Need CEUs? Become a AudiologyOnline member to get unlimited CEUs.

Only $129/yr

Learn More

Vanderbilt Audiology Journal Club: Clinical Insights from Recent Hearing Aid Research
Presented by Todd Ricketts, PhD, Erin Margaret Picou, AuD, PhD, H. Gustav Mueller, PhD
Recorded Webinar
AudiologyOnline

Presenters

Todd Ricketts, PhDErin Margaret Picou, AuD, PhDH. Gustav Mueller, PhD
Course: #37376Level: Intermediate1 Hour
  'Interesting points regarding satisfaction and success with hearing aids'   Read Reviews
This course will review new key journal articles on hearing aid technology and provide clinical implications for practicing audiologists.

View this Course for FREE.
Need CEUs? Become a AudiologyOnline member to get unlimited CEUs.

Only $129/yr

Learn More

61% Better Hearing in Noise: The Roger Portfolio
Presented by Steve Hallenbeck
Recorded Webinar
Mon, Nov 18, 2024 at 12:00 pm EST
Phonak

Presenter

Steve Hallenbeck
Course: #38656Level: Introductory1 Hour
  'good information'   Read Reviews
Every patient wants to hear better in noise, whether it be celebrating over dinner with a group of friends or on a date with your significant other. Roger technology provides a significant improvement over normal-hearing ears, hearing aids, and cochlear implants to deliver excellent speech understanding.

View this Course for FREE.
Need CEUs? Become a AudiologyOnline member to get unlimited CEUs.

Only $129/yr

Learn More

Our site uses cookies to improve your experience. By using our site, you agree to our Privacy Policy.