AudiologyOnline Phone: 800-753-2160


MED-EL - Implant Experience - August 2023

How is ANL Different from Signal-to-Noise Ratio Scores

Melinda C. Freyaldenhoven, MA, CCC-A, Patrick N. Plyler, PhD, CCC-A

January 29, 2007

Share:

Question

I'm confused as to how signal-to-noise ratio scores are not related to Acceptable Noise Level (ANL) measurements. I use the QuickSIN and it seems to measure the same thing as ANL. What is key to both is the ability to understand the speech when background noise is present. Can you explain the difference?

Answer

ANL is simply not an intelligibility task. I think that Audiologists have spent so much time working towards improving intelligibility in noise with various products that it is hard to get past the idea that ANL does not measure intelligibility. When someone is using the HINT or SPIN or QuickSIN, they are getting a very definite score. As an example, the HINT measures the level at which the patient can correctly identify 50% of sentences. An ANL is a little more subjective. You have to remember that our instructions are "...select the level of background noise that is the MOST you would be willing to accept of "put-up-with" without becoming tense and tired while following the story." This is very different than straining to get 50% correct, regardless of the signal-to-noise ratio. When an ANL is measured the listener may be identifying 40% or 50% or 60% of what the talker is saying to understand the story and tolerate the amount of noise that is present. This has been supported by our research in that we do not see a relationship between scores from tests like the HINT and ANLs. In other words, ANLs and speech perception tests measure two different reactions to background noise.

If you would like additional information on the ANL measurement, please visit our lab's website at web.utk.edu/~aspweb/faculty/nabelek/anl.shtml

Melinda C. Freyaldenhoven, Ph.D., CCC-A (Assistant Professor): Mindy earned the Ph.D. degree in Speech and Hearing Science from The University of Tennessee (Knoxville) in 2006. She is currently an Assistant Professor at Louisiana Tech University (Ruston).

Patrick N. Plyler, Ph.D., CCC-A (Assistant Professor): Patrick earned the Ph.D. degree in Speech and Hearing Science from The University of Tennessee (Knoxville) in 1998. He then moved to Louisiana State University (Baton Rouge), where he was an Assistant Professor for 5 years. In 2004, Patrick returned to The University of Tennessee (Knoxville) as an Assistant Professor.


Melinda C. Freyaldenhoven, MA, CCC-A

Melinda Freyaldenhoven received the Master of Arts degree in Audiology in May 2003 and will receive the Doctor of Philosophy degree in Speech and Hearing Science in August 2006.  Ms. Freyaldenhoven’s research has concentrated on the Acceptable Noise Level (ANL) procedure.  She has 6 research manuscripts “in print” or “in press,” presented research at 12 national or international conferences, and received 5 grants/scholarships.  Ms. Freyaldenhoven also served as an instructor for an Amplification Technology at The University of Tennessee.


patrick n plyler

Patrick N. Plyler, PhD, CCC-A

Assistant Professor.

Patrick Plyler graduated from The University of Tennessee with his Doctor of Philosophy in 1998.  He then moved to Louisiana State University, where he was an Assistant Professor for 5 years.  In 2004, Dr. Plyler returned to The University of Tennessee as an Assistant Professor.  Dr. Plyler’s research interests are in the areas of diagnostic audiology, efficacy of advanced features in modern hearing instruments, and speech perception in quiet and in noise.  Dr. Plyler has received external support for several research projects, most of which have investigated various features in digital hearing instruments.  Dr. Plyler has published articles in the following journals: Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, Journal of Educational Audiology, Clinical Neurophysiology, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, and Journal of Speech-Language Hearing Research.  In addition, Dr. Plyler serves as an editorial consultant for the American Journal of Audiology, the Journal of Educational Audiology, Trends in Amplification, and the Journal of Speech-Language Hearing Research. Melinda Freyaldenhoven and Patrick Plyler have nothing to disclose.


Related Courses

20Q: Hearing Aid Levels of Technology—Supporting Research Evidence?
Presented by Patrick N. Plyler, PhD, CCC-A
Text/Transcript
AudiologyOnline

Presenter

Patrick N. Plyler, PhD, CCC-A
Course: #38273Level: Intermediate1.5 Hours
  'very applicable to my job every day'   Read Reviews
This course addresses hearing aid technology levels. Specifically, the course explains what hearing aid technology levels are, summarizes current research regarding the evaluation of hearing aid technology levels, and provides clinical implications for the selection and verification of hearing aid technology levels for the practicing hearing health care provider.

View this Course for FREE.
Need CEUs? Become a AudiologyOnline member to get unlimited CEUs.

Only $129/yr

Learn More

A Deeper Look at Sound Environments
Presented by Don Schum, PhD
Recorded Webinar
Oticon

Presenter

Don Schum, PhD
Course: #33536Level: Intermediate1 Hour
  'Very well articulated'   Read Reviews
The characteristics of the sound environment have a fundamental impact on the performance of the hearing aid user. In this course, we will describe the obvious and sometimes more subtle aspects of sound environments that will affect hearing aid performance.

View this Course for FREE.
Need CEUs? Become a AudiologyOnline member to get unlimited CEUs.

Only $129/yr

Learn More

The Subjective Evaluation of a New Hearing Aid Fitting
Presented by Don Schum, PhD
Recorded Webinar
Oticon

Presenter

Don Schum, PhD
Course: #35584Level: Intermediate1 Hour
  'Very informative and pragmatic presentation regarding the importance of incorporating a subjective evaluation into the hearing aid fitting process'   Read Reviews
The final judge of the success of a new fitting will of course be the patient, and the criteria that they use may not always be in line with an objective audiological measure. This course will review some of the issues and options at play when having the patient weigh in on the value of the new devices.

View this Course for FREE.
Need CEUs? Become a AudiologyOnline member to get unlimited CEUs.

Only $129/yr

Learn More

Auditory Wellness: What Clinicians Need to Know
Presented by Brian Taylor, AuD, Barbara Weinstein, PhD
Audio
Signia

Presenters

Brian Taylor, AuDBarbara Weinstein, PhD
Course: #36608Level: Intermediate0.5 Hours
  'i loved the podcast format'   Read Reviews
As most hearing care professionals know, the functional capabilities of individuals with hearing loss are defined by more than the audiogram. Many of these functional capabilities fall under the rubric, auditory wellness. This podcast will be a discussion between Brian Taylor of Signia and his guest, Barbara Weinstein, professor of audiology at City University of New York. They will outline the concept of auditory wellness, how it can be measured clinically and how properly fitted hearing aids have the potential to improve auditory wellness.

View this Course for FREE.
Need CEUs? Become a AudiologyOnline member to get unlimited CEUs.

Only $129/yr

Learn More

Vanderbilt Audiology Journal Club: Clinical Insights from Recent Hearing Aid Research
Presented by Todd Ricketts, PhD, Erin Margaret Picou, AuD, PhD, H. Gustav Mueller, PhD
Recorded Webinar
AudiologyOnline

Presenters

Todd Ricketts, PhDErin Margaret Picou, AuD, PhDH. Gustav Mueller, PhD
Course: #37376Level: Intermediate1 Hour
  'Interesting points regarding satisfaction and success with hearing aids'   Read Reviews
This course will review new key journal articles on hearing aid technology and provide clinical implications for practicing audiologists.

View this Course for FREE.
Need CEUs? Become a AudiologyOnline member to get unlimited CEUs.

Only $129/yr

Learn More

Our site uses cookies to improve your experience. By using our site, you agree to our Privacy Policy.